Referential Structure in Communication (RED 2024)
Pub 2024-02-20; LastMod 2024-03-21International Conference on Language and Communication
as part of the Research Network on Referential Expressions in Discourse (RED)
and the Mutual Understanding Project of the University of Tokyo
Aims
Referential expressions introduce, activate, and maintain the objects of our communicative actions. Referential structure itself is formed by the intricate interaction of referential information and conceptual information (Gernsbacher 1991; Brocher & von Heusinger 2018). Research has focused on the felicitous conditions of referential expressions (Ariel 1988) and the interaction of speaker-oriented planning and hearer expectation (Kehler et al. 2008, Bott & Solstad 2021), as well as on their interaction with prominence (von Heusinger and Schumacher 2019). Recent approaches also include the forward-looking function (or discourse structuring potential) of referential expressions (Chiriacescu & von Heusinger 2010), the role of quantifiers in the licensing of anaphoric expressions (Schmitt et al. 2017) and the role of questions of specification in the marking and interpretation of referential expressions (Onea 2021). Important advances have been also achieved in stochastic modeling of reference including redundancy effects (Degen et al. 2021) and extending current theories to Sign Languages (Schlenker 2018). While significant progress has been made in recent years, an overall integrative theory of reference in discourse and the dynamics of referential expressions in communication is still missing.
We invite researchers in semantics, pragmatics, philosophy, and communication science to submit their original research, focusing on the contribution of referential expressions and discourse structure to establishing particular communicative effects and goals in discourse.
Keynote Speakers
- Chiara Gianollo, Bologna
- Jesse Harris, Los Angeles
- Jet Hoek, Nijmegen
- Sofiana Lindemann, BraΘov
- Edgar Onea, Graz
Important Dates
Deadline for submissions: December 11, 2023Notification of authors: December 20, 2024- Workshop: 18β19 March 2024
Venue
Collaboration Room 3, Bldg. 18, the University of Tokyo, Komaba
Registration
Registration is required for all participants. Because of space limitations, those who would like to participate are kindly asked to contact the organization team.
Internal Circular
See this page. Participants who registered will receive the password from us.
Contact
RED24-group SpamProtection g.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Program
Monday, March 18, 2024
Time | Title |
---|---|
9:00 β 9:30 | Opening |
9:30 β 10:30 | Invited Lecture Jesse Harris (Los Angeles) Something else on something else |
10:30 β 11:00 | β Coffee break |
11:00 β 11:45 | Hanjung Lee (Seoul) Communicative Efficiency, Grounding and Crosslinguistic Patterns of Differential Subject Marking |
11:45 β 12:30 | Ivona Kucerova & Aya Zarka (Hamilton) On the Interaction of Differential Object Marking and non-default Discourse Commitments |
12:30 β 14:30 | π΄ Lunch break |
14:30 β 15:30 | Invited Lecture Chiara Gianollo (Bologna) Cross-linguistic variation in the anaphoric functions of βotherβ |
15:30 β 16:15 | Katsumasa Ito (Osaka) On topic drop in German: A dual ellipsis approach |
16:15 β 17:00 | Yoshiki Mori (Tokyo) & Yuto Yamazaki (Mie) QuD effects of word order variations in German cleft sentences |
17:00 β 17:30 | π΅ Short break |
17:30 β 18:30 | (pending) Jet Hoek (Nijmegen) The effect of meaning-related cues on the interpretation of Dutch pronominal forms |
Tuesday, March 19, 2024
Time | Title |
---|---|
9:00 β 9:30 | Opening |
9:30 β 10:30 | Invited Lecture Sofiana Lindemann (Brasov) Implicit causality biases of Romanian psychological state verbs |
10:30 β 11:00 | β Coffee break |
11:00 β 11:45 | Kristina Liefke & Markus Werning (Bochum) Towards a Theory of Reference in Parasitic Attitudes |
11:45 β 12:30 | Peter Hofmann (Kassel) I is another? On marking the boundaries of free indirect discourse |
12:30 β 14:30 | π΄ Lunch break |
14:30 β 15:15 | Nori Hayashi (Tokyo) What the additive construction suggests about indefinites and information structure |
15:15 β 16:15 | Invited Lecture Edgar Onea (Graz) A new perspective on topical indefinites |
Satellite workshop
On Wednesday, March 20, GAKT 8 will be held as a satellite workshop.
Poster
Organization
The workshop is organized by Klaus von Heusinger (University of Cologne) and Yoshiki Mori (University of Tokyo).
The workshop is supported by:
- Global Studies Initiative
- Center for Language, Information and Philosophy
- SFB 1252: Prominence in Language
Abstracts
We invite submissions for 30 min presentations (plus 15 min for discussion) in English. Abstracts should be anonymous and not longer than two pages (Times New Roman 12 pt., single space, 2.4 cm margins). They should be submitted in pdf format to RED24-group SpamProtection g.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp.
Topics of interest
include but are not limited to:
- Referential expressions and discourse structure
- Pragmatic aspects of reference in conversation
- Cross-linguistic variations in referential communication
- Referential ambiguity and resolution
- Cognitive processes involved in reference comprehension
- Linguistic markers of reference in written and spoken discourse
- Referential structure in signed or non-verbal communication
Literature
- Ariel, Mira. 1988. Referring and accessibility. Journal of Linguistics 24(1). 65β87. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4175921.
- Bott, Oliver & Solstad, Torgrim. 2021. Discourse expectations: explaining the implicit causality biases of verbs. Linguistics 59(2). 361β416. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2021-0007
- Brocher, Andreas & Klaus von Heusinger. 2018. A dual-process activation model: Processing definiteness and information status. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 3(1). 108. http://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.457.
- Chiriacescu, Sofiana & Klaus von Heusinger. 2010. Discourse prominence and pe-marking in Romanian. International Review of Pragmatics 2(2). 298β332. https://doi.org/10.1163/187731010X528377.
- Degen J, Hawkins RXD, Graf C, Kreiss E, Goodman ND. 2020. When redundancy is useful: a Bayesian approach to βoverinformative’ referring expressions. Psychol. Rev. 127(4). 591β621. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000186
- Gernsbacher, Morton A. 1991. Comprehending conceptual anaphors. Language and Cognitive Processes 6. 81β105. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969108406939
- von Heusinger, Klaus & Petra B. Schumacher. 2019. Discourse prominence: Definition and application. Journal of Pragmatics 154. 117β127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.07.025.
- Kehler, Andrew, Laura Kertz, Hannah Rohde & Jeffrey L. Elman. 2008. Coherence and coreference revisited. Journal of Semantics 25(1). 1β44. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffm018.
- Onea, Edgar. 2021. Specificity and Questions of Specification. In C. Gianollo, K. von Heusinger and M. Napoli (eds.). Determiners and Quantifiers. Leiden. Brill. 130β185. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004473324_006
- Schlenker, P. 2018. Locative Shift. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 3(1). 115. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.561
- Schmitt, Viola, Edgar Onea Gaspar & Friederike Buch. 2017. Restrictions on complement anaphora. In D. Burgdorf, J. Collard, S. Maspong and B. StefΓ‘nsdΓ³ttir (eds.). Proceedings of SALT 27. 212β229. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v27i0.4146